Prison, death, exile – Outcomes of peaceful opposition to a communist Cuba
There are 44 years of dissidence between Cuban human rights activist
Elizardo Sánchez and street protester Sara Martha Fonseca, four and a
half decades of peaceful opposition to a communist system that jails
people for simply “disrespecting” Fidel Castro.
In between were the Ladies in White, bloggers like Yoani Sánchez,
independent groups of journalists, librarians and lawyers, Afro-Cubans,
Catholic and Protestant and gay rights activists and everyone else
struggling for human and civil rights.
The Cuban government has branded them all as “counterrevolutionaries”
and “mercenaries” on the U.S. payroll. It has thrown thousands of them
in prison, freed them, forced them into exile abroad and then jailed
thousands more again.
Yet the dissidents not only survived but evolved into today’s
many-headed, multi-cause movement that, while still relatively small and
little known inside Cuba, is bigger than ever and commands intense
attention and respect abroad.
Blogger Yoani Sánchez won an armful of international prizes. The
European Union awarded its Sakharov prize for human rights in 2010 to
Guillermo Fariñas and in 2005 to the Ladies in White, female relatives
of political prisoners.
Only a handful believe they can topple the system. But through sheer
defiance and persistence, they have carved out spaces once thought
impossible — for the Ladies in White the right to march down the streets
of Havana every Sunday, for others the possibility of uncensored access
to Sánchez’s blog.
“The important thing is that as recently as 1987 there were only 10 of
us in Havana, and now there are thousands of us throughout the country,”
said Elizardo Sánchez, who has spent 44 of his 70 years as a human
rights activist — 8½ of them in prison.
A former professor of Marxist philosophy at the University of Havana, he
broke with Fidel Castro in 1967 and now heads the Cuban Commission for
Human Rights and National Reconciliation, which meticulously monitors
and tabulates government abuses.
Compare that with Fonseca, a 47-year-old high school dropout who staged
a string of stunningly daring protests in very public places, including
the Capitol building in central Havana, with the declared intent of
sparking a street disturbance.
Yet Fonseca sees no difference between the many generations of dissent.
“We have one same destiny, to oppose the government,” she said. “Some do
it with human rights, some with technology, like the bloggers. My thing
is the streets, to take our message to the people and look for ways to
have the people join us.”
Elizardo Sánchez acknowledges that he is the last of the founders of the
dissident movement still living in Cuba. Many others, like Gustavo
Arcos, have died. Dozens of others went into exile abroad after
suffering years of government persecution.
They were followed by more politically minded dissidents like Oswaldo
Payá, whose Varela Project collected 25,000 signatures demanding a
referendum on the communist system, and Héctor Palacios of the Liberal
Union. Payá died in 2012 in what the Cuban government says was a traffic
accident and what his family insists was a crash caused by state
security agents. His immediate family now lives in South Florida.
Other leaders have included hardliners like former Cuban air force MiG
pilot Vladimiro Roca and economist Martha Beatriz Roque; Catholic
activists like Dagoberto Valdés; and Oscar Elías Biscet, a physician who
started out alleging abuses in abortion procedures.
U.S. diplomats in Havana reported in 2009 that dissidents were “the
conscience of Cuba” and blamed many of their setbacks on penetrations by
Cuban government agents designed to fuel internal rivalries.
But the dispatch, made public by Wikileaks, went on to report that the
“traditional dissidents” were old, carried little weight on the island
and were unlikely to play a significant role in its future.
“We see very little evidence that the main-line dissident organizations
have much resonance among ordinary Cubans,” it said. They also “have
little contact with younger Cubans and, to the extent they have a
message… it does not appeal to that segment.”
The cable suggested U.S. policy should look more to “the younger
generation of nontraditional dissidents” like bloggers and artists
“likely to have a greater long term impact on post-Castro Cuba.”
Fidel Castro tried to crush dissent once and for all in 2003, when his
security forces arrested 75 government critics across the island and his
courts sentenced them to up to 28 years in prison in a string of one and
two-day trials known as Cuba’s Black Spring. All were declared
“prisoners of conscience” by Amnesty International.
But just weeks later, wives, mothers and daughters of the prisoners who
had met while visiting their male relatives in jail began staging Sunday
marches down Havana streets dressed in white and carrying pink gladioli.
The Ladies in White eventually became the only opposition group usually
allowed by security forces to stage such street protests, and helped
push Raúl Castro into agreeing in mid-2010 to free the last of the 75
dissidents still in jail. Most were taken directly from prison to the
Havana airport to board flights to exile in Spain, and only 12 remain on
In his final years in power, Fidel Castro’s repressive tactics shifted
from long prison sentences to short-term detentions — with the
dissidents sometimes dropped off in remote areas. Elizardo Sánchez
reported 8,899 such arbitrary short-term detentions in 2014, nearly
2,500 more than the previous year.
Dissidents also were subjected to verbal and physical harassment by
government-organized mobs and pressured to leave the island.
Yet the opposition movement continued to grow and evolve, along with the
Yoani Sánchez, who started out posting anonymously on the frustrations
of daily life, had by 2008 become the world-famous face of a digital
dissidence that included some 40 blogs, ranging from her Generación Y to
Cubanoconfesante, written by Mario Felix Lleonart Barroso, a dissident
Protestant pastor based in rural Taguayabón.
The new crop of bloggers — some prefer to be called “independent” or
“alternative” writers rather than “dissident” — now include a former
Cuban government counter-intelligence analyst, a lawyer, a photographer
and several gay-rights activists and university students. Their blogs
are based on servers abroad to get around the censorship, and are often
then emailed back to the island.
Trying to fight back, the government has deployed squads of
pro-revolution bloggers, most of them state employees, and created
Internet sites especially designed to engage in a “cyberwar” against the
Sánchez pushed on, founding a blogger’s academy and opening a Twitter
account that almost immediately alerts to arrests and other government
abuses. Most recently, she launched a digital news site called 14ymedio.
In the latest evolution of the dissidence, Fonseca and other women set
out to stage protests in public places with the stated hope of getting
people to join them and sparking a street disturbance.
The strategy of the Patriotic Union of Cuba (UNPACU), the largest and
most active dissident group on the island, especially in eastern Cuba,
is even more ambitious. Its leader, José Daniel Ferrer, one of the 75
arrested in 2003, has insisted on the opposition movement’s “need to
coordinate more and more actions across the country” and work “with the
people, person by person” in order to reinvent itself.
“When we persist in maintaining the old paradigms and these demonstrate
patriotism, heroism, sacrifice, but do not attract the population, we
must modernize our strategies,” Ferrer told El Nuevo Herald. With that
goal, UNPACU has developed one of the most effective media strategies
within the opposition movement by providing a steady stream of news,
videos and other content on the Internet.
Palacios, another of the so-called “75,” said that the greatest
challenge facing the opposition is to establish a strong bond with the
Cuban people, “who are the only ones who can change the situation on the
island. Until the population has faith in the opposition movement and we
educate ourselves to prepare for change, it will not happen.”
Said Ferrer: “Nobody will get on a boat they are told will sink 15 miles
offshore. It’s the same with the Cuban people: They are eager to take
part in an expedition toward freedom and democracy but they want to make
sure they are on a sturdy ship, in this case the opposition movement,
and they want to see good captains on the bridge who know how to navigate.”
Even Fonseca, the feisty protestor, acknowledged that the government’s
repressive tactics could force her to reach for exile abroad — a safety
valve that has helped keep the dissident movement relatively small and
isolated over the past five decades.
“I have two roads ahead, and I know them very well,” she said in 2011.
“On one road I would go to prison, and I would not come out alive. I
know that would end my life. The other is to leave. It’s not what I
want. But it is one road.”
Fonseca indeed went into exile in the United States on Jan. 7, 2014. She
now lives with her family in New Jersey.
Elizardo Sánchez, first arrested in 1972 on charges of “expressing
criticism of Comandante Fidel Castro,” said he accepts that the road
ahead for dissidents appears to be long and hard.
Sánchez himself suffered a blow to his reputation in 2003 following the
release of a video showing a state security officer giving him a medal.
Sánchez denied the accusation and said he was set up, but dissidents
have long had to contend with infiltrations by state security agents to
promote internal conflict. Likewise, those linked to funds funneled by
the United States to pro-democracy programs in Cuba have had to fend off
accusations of being U.S. mercenaries.
Antonio Rodiles, a human rights activist who has led a demand for the
government to ratify several United Nations covenants, said that trying
to propel change without outside financial assistance is nearly
impossible because the Cuban government prevents dissidents from
generating “their own resources, especially to pay for a project that
could challenge the existing power. All that is coldly calculated. To
say that a Cuban can generate the necessary resources internally to
contribute to a regime change is totally absurd.”
Rodiles also warned that dissident groups should be more selective with
their members: “The opposition movement in Cuba must have a clear
profile of the people it wants within so that it can really gain
prestige within Cuban society. Otherwise, the government will use that
to try to denigrate the opposition movement.”
“The role of the dissidence has always been to present an alternative to
the totalitarian system,” said Elizardo Sánchez. “So the best we can do
is to do our work, and allow the younger people to perform the role that
falls to them.
“Society will generate its next leaders,” he said, adding a reference to
the Polish labor leader who helped end the communist rule of his nation.
“The Lech Walesas of Cuba are in the future.”
Miami Herald staff writer Nancy San Martin contributed to this report.
Source: Prison, death, exile: Outcomes of peaceful opposition to Fidel
Castro’s communist Cuba | Miami Herald –